United States v. Brewer

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Brewer

538 F. App'x 323

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2013·No. No. 13-6453·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Delphonso Oscar Brewer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification filed pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brewer, No. 2:94-cr-00200-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013). We deny as moot Brewer’s motion to remedy default. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Delphonso Oscar Brewer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification filed pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brewer, No. 2:94-cr-00200-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013). We deny as moot Brewer’s motion to remedy default. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Brewer, 538 F. App'x 323 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

538 F. App'x 323 (United States v. Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.