United States v. Bray
This text of 4 M.J. 660 (United States v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Army Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed, however, that portion of the convening authority’s action that purports to order the sentence into execution is disapproved.
In subsequent proceedings conducted under the authority of Article 72, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 872 and paragraphs 97b and 34, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), the convening authority revoked a suspension he had earlier approved. As we find that those proceedings were not conducted in full compliance with the requirements contained in United States v. Bingham, 3 M.J. 119 (CMA 1977) and United States v. Rozycki, 3 M.J. 127 (CMA 1977), General Court-Martial Order Number 7, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, APO San Francisco 96225, dated 9 September 1976, is set aside and the record is returned to the same or a different convening authority to conduct a new vacation proceedings if practicable.
Judge DRIBBEN and Judge DeFORD concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 M.J. 660, 1977 CMR LEXIS 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bray-usarmymilrev-1977.