United States v. Braxton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Braxton

286 F. App'x 48

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2008·No. 08-6650·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kirby Patrick Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his Motion to Modify Payment Schedule. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Braxton, No. 4:05-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kirby Patrick Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his Motion to Modify Payment Schedule. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Braxton, No. 4:05-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Braxton, 286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

286 F. App'x 48 (United States v. Braxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.