United States v. BRAVO
This text of United States v. BRAVO (United States v. BRAVO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before DALY, GROSS, and FLUHR Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Andy BRAVO Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202500437
Decided: 4 May 2026
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Todd J. Gaston
Sentence adjudged 24 July 2025 by a special court-martial tried at Ma- rine Corps Base Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for 89 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Major Colin W. Hotard, USMCR United States v. Bravo, NMCCA No. 202500437 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights oc- curred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. BRAVO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bravo-nmcca-2026.