United States v. Bravo

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bravo

457 F. App'x 835

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 7, 2012·No. No. 11-13545·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robin Joy Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Alexander Taborda Bravo, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bravo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robin Joy Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Alexander Taborda Bravo, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bravo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bravo, 457 F. App'x 835 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

457 F. App'x 835 (United States v. Bravo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related