United States v. Bravo

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bravo

457 F. App'x 835

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 7, 2012

DocketNo. 11-13545

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 457 F. App'x 835 (United States v. Bravo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bravo, 457 F. App'x 835 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robin Joy Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Alexander Taborda Bravo, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bravo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robin Joy Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Alexander Taborda Bravo, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bravo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

457 F. App'x 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bravo-ca11-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack