United States v. Brantley
76 M.J. 62, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 15
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 12, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0055/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 62 (United States v. Brantley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Brantley, 76 M.J. 62, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 15 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20150199. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT PROVED BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT APPELLANT KNEW OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT SR WAS “OTHERWISE UNAWARE” OF SEXUAL CONTACT.
[63]*63Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 62, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brantley-armfor-2017.