United States v. Bradley Dieffenbacher

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: August 15, 2024
• Docket: 24-12204
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-12204 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 08/15/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12204 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRADLEY DIEFFENBACHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00504-MSS-CPT-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12204 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 08/15/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12204

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, as duplicative because Bradley Dieffenbacher again seeks to appeal from his criminal judg- ment, which we affirmed in 2023 before he filed his instant pro se notice of appeal. See United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978) (holding that appellants are not entitled to two appeals); I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson Nat’l Bank, 793 F.2d 1541, 1551 (11th Cir. 1986) (noting that federal courts may dismiss duplicative litigation to conserve judicial resources). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.