United States v. Bradley Dieffenbacher

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12204

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRADLEY DIEFFENBACHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00504-MSS-CPT-1

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12204

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, as duplicative because Bradley Dieffenbacher again seeks to appeal from his criminal judgment , which we affirmed in 2023 before he filed his instant pro se notice of appeal. See United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978) (holding that appellants are not entitled to two appeals); I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson Nat’l Bank, 793 F.2d 1541, 1551 (11th Cir. 1986) (noting that federal courts may dismiss duplicative litigation to conserve judicial resources).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.