United States v. Bradley

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bradley

20 F. App'x 193

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bradley. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 F. App'x 412 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2001·No. 01-1757·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Bradley appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration challenging service of process. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bradley, No. CA-00-12-3 (W-D-Va. May 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Bradley appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration challenging service of process. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bradley, No. CA-00-12-3 (W-D-Va. May 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bradley, 20 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

20 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.