United States v. Bradley

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bradley

348 F. App'x 547

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 13, 2009·No. No. 09-12766·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Richard Lee Bradley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bradley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Richard Lee Bradley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bradley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bradley, 348 F. App'x 547 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

348 F. App'x 547 (United States v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related