United States v. Bradford

53 F. 542, 1893 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4
CourtDistrict Court, D. South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 6, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 F. 542 (United States v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bradford, 53 F. 542, 1893 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4 (D.S.C. 1893).

Opinion

SIMONTON, District Judge.

The defendant is indicted under the act of congress approved 18th April, 1884, (23 St. p. 11,) falsely and fraudulently pretending and assuming to be an employe of the United States in order to defraud the United States or the Northeastern [543]*543Railroad Company. The admitted facts in the case are that on the morning of 19th December, 1X92, Mr. Waring, postal clerk, was in his postal car at the depot of the Northeastern Railroad in Charleston. After assorting his mail, and while resting, he discovered the defendant concealing himself in a dark corner of the car. As soon as lie discovered him, he sprung up and seized him by the collar. That defendant said at once, “I am Bradford, and in the service.” Waring denying that he was in the service, defendant then said, “I have been discharged, but I am trying to steal a ride to Florence.” Waring bad an officer called, by whom defendant was arrested. In order to convict the defendant under this act, it must appear that he had formed an intent to defraud either the United States or the Northeastern Railroad Company; and that, to carry out this intent, — that is to say, as the means of consummating his intent, — he falsely pretended to be an employe of the United States. If it was his intent to defraud the United States, ii must he shown by evidence that he falsely pretended to he such an employe to some agent of the government, in order, under this false personation, to consummate his intent. If his intent were to defraud the railroad company, then he must have represented falsely to some agent of the railroad company that he was an employe of the United States. These essential elements are wanting in this case. The jury must find the defendant not guilty

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rush
196 F. 579 (E.D. Washington, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F. 542, 1893 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bradford-scd-1893.