United States v. Bradford

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bradford

173 F. App'x 759

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 22, 2006·No. No. 05-14225; D.C. Docket No. 99-00172-1-CR-CB·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Latisha V. Colvin, appointed counsel for Anthony Bradford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bradford’s revocation of supervised release and corresponding sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Latisha V. Colvin, appointed counsel for Anthony Bradford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bradford’s revocation of supervised release and corresponding sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bradford, 173 F. App'x 759 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 759 (United States v. Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related