United States v. Braden
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 96-20585 Summary Calendar _____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OTIS GEORGE BRADEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-255 _________________________________________________________________ April 11, 1997
Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Otis George Braden appeals his guilty plea conviction and
sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base.
Braden’s unconditional guilty plea bars him from challenging the
district court’s ruling on his pretrial discovery motion. See
United States v. Smallwood, 920 F.2d 1231, 1240 (5th Cir. 1991).
Furthermore, the district court did not commit plain error by
failing to find that sentencing guideline and statutory provisions
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. relating to the carrying of a weapon during an offense were
unconstitutional. See United States v. Owens, 996 F.2d 59, 61 (5th
Cir. 1993). Finally, the court did not commit plain error in
refusing to make a downward departure from the sentencing
guidelines based upon the fact that Braden’s behavior was
“aberrant.” See United States v. Burleson, 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th
Cir. 1994).
A F F I R M E D.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Braden (United States v. Braden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.