United States v. Boynes
523 F.3d 451, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8263, 2008 WL 1747166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Boynes. Read the opinion of the Court — 515 F.3d 284 →
Opinions
ORDER
A member of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Williams and Judges Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Traxler, King, Shedd and Duncan voted against rehearing en banc. Judges Michael, Motz and Gregory voted to grant rehearing en banc.
Because the poll on rehearing en banc failed to produce a majority of judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc, rehearing en banc is denied. Judge [452]*452Gregory wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Boynes, 523 F.3d 451, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8263, 2008 WL 1747166 (4th Cir. 2008).
523 F.3d 451 (United States v. Boynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patton v. United States
281 U.S. 276 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Johnson v. Zerbst
304 U.S. 458 (Supreme Court, 1938)