United States v. Boyles

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 2017
Docket201700100
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Boyles (United States v. Boyles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Boyles, (N.M. 2017).

Opinion

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________

No. 201700100 _________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. SAMUEL T. BOYLES Hospitalman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Zimmerman, USMC. Convening Authority: Commanding General, Training Command, Quantico, VA. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Michael E. Sayegh, USMC. For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________

Decided 30 June 2017 _________________________

Before CAMPBELL, F ULTON , and H UTCHISON , Appellate Military Judges _________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental promulgating order will reflect that following the merger of Specifications 2 and 5 under Charge I, Specification 2 reads as follows: In that Hospitalman Apprentice Samuel T. Boyles, U.S. Navy Reserves, on active duty, did, at an unknown location, on or about 10 January 2016, commit a lewd act upon D.M.S., a child who had not attained the age of 16 years, to wit: intentionally communicating indecent language to D.M.S., through communication technology, and intentionally sending a digital image of an erect penis to D.M.S. through communication technology with an intent to arouse United States v. Boyles, No. 201700100

or gratify his sexual desire. United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Crumpley
49 M.J. 538 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Boyles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boyles-nmcca-2017.