United States v. Boyle
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30969 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRY QUINTON BOYLE, also known as Richard Lloyd Collins,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CR-30003 - - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Terry Quinton Boyle pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess
with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine
hydrochloride. Boyle appeals his sentence. He contends that the
district court erred in determining that his prior robbery
convictions constituted crimes of violence. He also contends
that the district court imposed an excessive sentence by choosing
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30969 - 2 -
the high end of the Sentencing Guideline range.
A defendant is a career offender if he is at least 18 years
old at the time of the instant offense; the instant offense is a
felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled
substance offense; and he has at least two prior felony
convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled
substance offense. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Robbery is a “crime of
violence.” § 4B1.2, comment. (n.2). Boyle’s sentence was not
imposed in violation of the law, as a result of a misapplication
of the Sentencing Guidelines, and is not “plainly unreasonable.”
United States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995).
Boyle’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Boyle (United States v. Boyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.