United States v. Boyd

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2463 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:20-cr-00121-DLC-1 v. MEMORANDUM* GREGORY RICHARD BOYD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Richard Boyd appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his bench-trial conviction for being a prohibited person in possession of

a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Boyd asserts that § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment, both facially

and as applied to him as a purportedly non-violent felon. This claim is foreclosed.

See United States v. Duarte, 137 F.4th 743, 750 (9th Cir. 2025) (en banc)

(“[Section] 922(g)(1) is constitutional as applied to non-violent felons[.]”), cert.

denied, __ S. Ct. __, 2026 WL 135692 (U.S. Jan. 20, 2026).

AFFIRMED.

2 23-2463