United States v. Boyd

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Boyd

60 F. App'x 485

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Boyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 F. App'x 662 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2003·No. 03-6258·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his “Notice of Motion to Dismiss Indictment Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim. Rule 12(b)(2)” and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Boyd, Nos. CR-93-123-F-5; CA-00-220-7-F (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 13, 2002 & entered Sept. 16, 2002; Oct. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his “Notice of Motion to Dismiss Indictment Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim. Rule 12(b)(2)” and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Boyd, Nos. CR-93-123-F-5; CA-00-220-7-F (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 13, 2002 & entered Sept. 16, 2002; Oct. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Boyd, 60 F. App'x 485 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 485 (United States v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.