United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood

455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 1972

Docket71-3392

StatusPublished

This text of 455 F.2d 518 (United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood, 455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2 United States v. Durham, 5th Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 1003, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 89 (1969).

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

2

. Appellant contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motions for acquittal based on entrapment at the close of the Government’s case and at the close of all the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2 United States v. Durham, 5th Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 1003, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 89 (1969).

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

2

. Appellant contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motions for acquittal based on entrapment at the close of the Government’s case and at the close of all the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boyce-isbell-and-tracy-underwood-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack