United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood

455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 16, 1972·No. 71-3392·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2 United States v. Durham, 5th Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 1003, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 89 (1969).

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

2

. Appellant contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motions for acquittal based on entrapment at the close of the Government’s case and at the close of all the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood, 455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697 (5th Cir. 1972).

455 F.2d 518 (United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related