United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood
455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697
Opinion
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2 United States v. Durham, 5th Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 1003, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 89 (1969).
1
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
2
. Appellant contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motions for acquittal based on entrapment at the close of the Government’s case and at the close of all the evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood, 455 F.2d 518, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10697 (5th Cir. 1972).
455 F.2d 518 (United States v. Boyce Isbell and Tracy Underwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. McKinley Durham and Lucious Patterson, Sr.
413 F.2d 1003 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990
430 F.2d 966 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Washington v. Golden State Mutual Life Insurance
396 U.S. 839 (Supreme Court, 1969)