United States v. Bowman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2023·No. 22-10549·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-10549 Document: 00516634898 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10549 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 3, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rodney Lamond Bowman,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-574-2 ______________________________

Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodney Bowman has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bowman has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10549 Document: 00516634898 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2023

No. 22-10549

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo- lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is ex- cused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bowman, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Bowman (United States v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)