United States v. Bowersox
71 M.J. 362, 2012 WL 4848939, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 813
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJuly 13, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0398/AR
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 71 M.J. 362 (United States v. Bowersox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Bowersox, 71 M.J. 362, 2012 WL 4848939, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 813 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 20100580. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER APPELLANT’S CONVICTION OF VIOLATING 18 U.S.C. 1466A(b)(l), AS IMPORTED THROUGH CLAUSE 3 OF ARTICLE 134, [363]*363UCMJ, IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED TO HIM BECAUSE THE MINORS DEPICTED IN THE MATERIAL AT ISSUE WERE NOT ACTUAL MINORS. SEE ASHCROFT v. FREE SPEECH COALITION, 535 U.S. 234 (2002); UNITED STATES v. WHORLEY, 550 F.3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008).
Briefs will be file under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Bowersox
72 M.J. 71 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 362, 2012 WL 4848939, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bowersox-armfor-2012.