United States v. Bounds

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2000·No. 99-21181·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21181 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SARAH ELIZABETH BOUNDS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-99-CR-589-1) -------------------- September 27, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Sarah Elizabeth Bounds appeals her

conviction for making false claims to the United States Government,

through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 287. She argues that the district court erred in

reaching a guilty verdict after a bench trial because the evidence

did not show that she falsely claimed that she owned and resided at

the home that was flooded.

Bounds has waived any argument that the home was not her

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. principal place of residence at the time of the flood. See United

States v. Fagan, 821 F.2d 1002, 1015 n.10 (5th Cir. 1987).

Moreover, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict

because it established that Bounds transferred ownership of the

home prior to the flood. See United States v. Ferguson, 211 F.3d

878, 882 (5th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bounds, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Bounds (United States v. Bounds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ferguson
211 F.3d 878 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Ralph G. Fagan
821 F.2d 1002 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)