United States v. Bouie

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bouie

159 F. App'x 932

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 16, 2005·No. No. 04-15439; D. C. Docket No. 03-00056-CR-1-MMP·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Augustus Harper, appointed counsel for Charles Lee Bouie, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bouie’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Moreover, because there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal, Bouie’s pro se request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Augustus Harper, appointed counsel for Charles Lee Bouie, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bouie’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Moreover, because there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal, Bouie’s pro se request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

United States v. Bouie, 159 F. App'x 932 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

159 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Bouie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related