United States v. Boucher
This text of 55 F. App'x 869 (United States v. Boucher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Emory Joseph Boucher appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his term of supervised release. He contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3583, which authorizes the imposition of a term of supervised release, is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Liero, 298 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.2002), cert. den., — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 913, — L.Ed.2d -, 71 U.S.L.W. 3473 (U.S. Jan. 13, 2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [870]*870courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boucher-ca9-2003.