United States v. Botelho-Perez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Botelho-Perez

126 F. App'x 136

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2005·No. No. 04-8011·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Botehlo-Perez, No. CR-02-124 (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Botehlo-Perez, No. CR-02-124 (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Botelho-Perez, 126 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 136 (United States v. Botelho-Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.