United States v. Botelho-Perez

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 20, 2005
• Docket: 04-8011
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-8011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN EDWIN BOTELHO-PEREZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-124)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, Appellant Pro Se. John Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals

the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his

sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Botehlo-

Perez, No. CR-02-124 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -