United States v. Boston & Maine R. R.

33 F.2d 890, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9245, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2848, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 9245
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1929
DocketNo. 2235
StatusPublished

This text of 33 F.2d 890 (United States v. Boston & Maine R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Boston & Maine R. R., 33 F.2d 890, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9245, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2848, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 9245 (1st Cir. 1929).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case raised the question whether the payment by the lessee, under the covenants of its lease, of ineome taxes assessable against the lessor constitute additional taxable income to such [891]*891lessor. On May 2, 1928, this question was certified to the Supreme Court of the United States [33 F. (2d) 889] under section 239 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 346). In an opinion of June 3, 1929, the Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative (United States v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 49 S. Ct. 505, 73 L. Ed. -), and by mandate dated July 5,1929, directed this court to take further proceedings in conformity therewith.

Pursuant thereto', the judgment of the District Court [23 F.(2d) 343] is reversed, and the ease is remanded to that court, with directions to enter judgment for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Boston & Maine Railroad
279 U.S. 732 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Boston & M. R. R. v. United States
23 F.2d 343 (D. Massachusetts, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F.2d 890, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9245, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2848, 7 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 9245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boston-maine-r-r-ca1-1929.