United States v. Bostic

20 M.J. 562, 1985 CMR LEXIS 3761
CourtU.S. Army Court of Military Review
DecidedApril 24, 1985
DocketCM 446748
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 20 M.J. 562 (United States v. Bostic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Army Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bostic, 20 M.J. 562, 1985 CMR LEXIS 3761 (usarmymilrev 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

NAUGHTON, Judge:

Consistent with his pleas, appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of the distribution of cocaine,1 the use of marijuana on 9 July 1984, and the use of cocaine on 9 July 1984, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982).

Appellant contends that the two specifications alleging the use of marijuana and cocaine on 9 July 1984 are multiplicious for findings purposes and should be consolidated into one specification. We disagree.

In a case such as this, it is necessary to go beyond the language of the specifications and analyze the evidence adduced at trial to determine whether the offenses are actually multiplicious for findings purposes. United States v. Fair, 17 M.J. 1036, 1038 (A.C.M.R.1984), pet. denied, 19 M.J. 33 (C.M.A.1984).

[563]*563The facts show that on 9 July 1984, appellant, along with two acquaintances, entered a billets room and “snorted” some cocaine. Shortly thereafter, they smoked a marijuana cigarette. The use of each substance was a separate and discrete act. Thus, the two specifications alleging use are separate for findings purposes. Cf. id., at 1038.

Senior Judge WOLD and Judge FELDER concur.

Only so much of the finding of guilty of Specification 1 of the Charge, as relates to quantity, as finds appellant wrongfully distributed 2.583 grams of cocaine, is affirmed. The remaining findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ray
51 M.J. 511 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1999)
United States v. Montgomery
30 M.J. 1118 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1989)
United States v. Nixon
29 M.J. 505 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 M.J. 562, 1985 CMR LEXIS 3761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bostic-usarmymilrev-1985.