United States v. Bosley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: January 16, 2025
• Docket: 24-10566
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-10566 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/16/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals No. 24-10566 Fifth Circuit

Summary Calendar FILED ____________ January 16, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Omar Sharil Bosley,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-562-1 ______________________________

Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Omar Sharil Bosley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bosley has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-10566 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/16/2025

No. 24-10566

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. There is a clerical error in the written judgment. The judgment does not accurately reflect that the district court ordered the sentence to run consecutively to any sentence imposed in certain pending state court cases and concurrently with any sentence imposed in other specific pending state court cases. Accordingly, we REMAND for the limited purpose of correcting this clerical error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; United States v. Illies, 805 F.3d 607, 610 (5th Cir. 2015).