United States v. Bornkessel
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50077 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARS NELSON BORNKESSEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CR-77 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lars Nelson Bornkessel was convicted by a jury for wire
fraud. Bornkessel did not raise the issue concerning the
district court’s enhancement for finding that he was a manager on
his first appeal and it will not be considered on this second
appeal. See Burroughs v. FFP Operatiing Partners, 70 F.3d 31, 33
(5th Cir. 1996); Eason v. Thaler, 73 F.3d 1322, 1329 (5th Cir.
1996). The district court did not err in finding that Bornkessel
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-50077 - 2 -
was responsible for $381,937.96 in losses as assistant manager at
Nationwide. See United States v. Davis, 76 F.3d 82, 84 (5th Cir.
1996). The district court did not abuse its discretion in
ordering restitution. See United States v. Ryan, 874 F.2d 1052,
1054 (5th Cir. 1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bornkessel (United States v. Bornkessel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.