United States v. Boone

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Boone

587 F. App'x 75

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2014·No. No. 14-7565·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Andre Boone appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 65 motion filed in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Boone, No. 2:99-cr-00116-AWA-10 (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2014). We deny Boone’s motion for urgent hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Andre Boone appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 65 motion filed in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Boone, No. 2:99-cr-00116-AWA-10 (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2014). We deny Boone’s motion for urgent hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Boone, 587 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

587 F. App'x 75 (United States v. Boone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.