United States v. Boone

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2001
Docket00-7608
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Boone (United States v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Boone, (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7608

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY BOONE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-90-149)

Submitted: January 11, 2001 Decided: January 19, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Boone, Appellant Pro Se. John Paul Corcoran, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Leroy Boone appeals the district court’s order denying his

“Rule 201 Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts,” in which he

alleged that the district court did not have jurisdiction to sen-

tence him. The district court construed Boone’s pleading as a

motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000), and denied it as

time-barred. Because Boone’s § 2255 motion was a successive motion

and Boone did not obtain authorization from this court to file it

in the district court, see § 2255; 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(b)(3)(A)

(West Supp. 2000), the district court did not have jurisdiction to

consider it. United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir.

2000). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Key
205 F.3d 773 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Boone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boone-ca4-2001.