United States v. Boomer

30 F. App'x 129
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2002·No. No. 01-4590·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Michelle Boomer appeals her conviction, in the wake of her guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841, 846 (West 1999 & Supp.2001). The only issue Boomer raises on appeal is that § 841 is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), a claim previously considered and rejected by this Court in United States v. McAllister, 272 F.3d 228, 231-33 (4th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we affirm Boomer’s conviction and sentence and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boomer, 30 F. App'x 129 (4th Cir. 2002).

30 F. App'x 129 (United States v. Boomer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Keith Andre McAllister
272 F.3d 228 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)