United States v. Booker T. Ford

461 F.2d 534, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9192
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1972·No. 71-2788·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal from a judgment following conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (attempting to negotiate and possession of a counterfeit federal reserve note), the only issue is whether the spurious twenty-dollar bill was, when found by an arresting officer, the fruit of an unlawful search. We hold that it was not.

The defendant was arrested in the vicinity of a store a few minutes after the storekeeper had called the police to give alarm concerning an attempt to negotiate counterfeit money. The defendant matched the storekeeper’s description of the would-be negotiator, and a cruising officer stopped him in response to the alarm. The key exhibit fell out of defendant’s clothing during a “pat-down” search for weapons. The arrest was based upon probable cause, and the incidental search was lawful.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Booker T. Ford, 461 F.2d 534, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9192 (9th Cir. 1972).

461 F.2d 534 (United States v. Booker T. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodis v. City and County Sf
Ninth Circuit, 2009
Rodis v. City & County of San Francisco
558 F.3d 964 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)