United States v. Booker T. Ford

461 F.2d 534, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9192
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1972
Docket71-2788
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 461 F.2d 534 (United States v. Booker T. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Booker T. Ford, 461 F.2d 534, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9192 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal from a judgment following conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (attempting to negotiate and possession of a counterfeit federal reserve note), the only issue is whether the spurious twenty-dollar bill was, when found by an arresting officer, the fruit of an unlawful search. We hold that it was not.

The defendant was arrested in the vicinity of a store a few minutes after the storekeeper had called the police to give alarm concerning an attempt to negotiate counterfeit money. The defendant matched the storekeeper’s description of the would-be negotiator, and a cruising officer stopped him in response to the alarm. The key exhibit fell out of defendant’s clothing during a “pat-down” search for weapons. The arrest was based upon probable cause, and the incidental search was lawful.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodis v. City and County Sf
Ninth Circuit, 2009
Rodis v. City & County of San Francisco
558 F.3d 964 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 F.2d 534, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-booker-t-ford-ca9-1972.