United States v. Bonds
This text of 28 F. Cas. 384 (United States v. Bonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a seizure of $70,000 worth of Southern bonds, the property of Mr. Guthrie, stopping at the Fifth Avenue Hotel. The jury, by direction of the court, rendered a verdict restoring the property to the claimant, the judge (SMALLEY, District Judge) charging that the confiscation act oí July 13, 1861 [12 Stat. 255] under which the [sixty-one] bonds were seized, was a revenue act, and covered only goods, chattels, wares, and merchandise, ■or such property as was properly cognizable under the revenue act; that it did not embrace choses in action, such as bonds, stocks, ■&c., nor any money.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F. Cas. 384, 9 Pitts L.J. 377, 1862 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bonds-nynd-1862.