United States v. Bond

213 F.3d 840, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11975, 2000 WL 702417
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bond. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 F.3d 225
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2000·No. 98-50074·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

The Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this Court 1 which affirmed the district court’s denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. Steven Dewayne Bond v. United States, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1462, 146 L.Ed.2d 365 (U.S.). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court.

SO ORDERED.

1

. United States v. Steven Dewayne Bond, 167 F.3d 225 (5th Cir.1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bond, 213 F.3d 840, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11975, 2000 WL 702417 (5th Cir. 2000).

213 F.3d 840 (United States v. Bond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bond v. United States
529 U.S. 334 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Bond
167 F.3d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)