United States v. Bond

213 F.3d 840, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11975, 2000 WL 702417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2000
Docket98-50074
StatusPublished

This text of 213 F.3d 840 (United States v. Bond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bond, 213 F.3d 840, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11975, 2000 WL 702417 (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

The Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this Court 1 which affirmed the district court’s denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. Steven Dewayne Bond v. United States, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1462, 146 L.Ed.2d 365 (U.S.). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court.

SO ORDERED.

1

. United States v. Steven Dewayne Bond, 167 F.3d 225 (5th Cir.1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bond v. United States
529 U.S. 334 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Bond
167 F.3d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 F.3d 840, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11975, 2000 WL 702417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bond-ca5-2000.