United States v. BOLES

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedMay 27, 2025
Docket202500088
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. BOLES (United States v. BOLES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. BOLES, (N.M. 2025).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, GANNON Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Gregory L. BOLES Special Warfare Boat Operator Senior Chief (E-8), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 202500088

Decided: 27 May 2025

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Mitchell D. Bishop

Sentence adjudged 5 November 2024 by a general court-martial tried at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con- finement for 118 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge. 1

For Appellant: Commander Jeanne W. Murray, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with have served 201 days of pretrial confinement. United States v. Boles, NMCCA No. 202500088 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 We note however that Specifications 2-6, 8-10, and 12-14 of the Charge, to which Appellant pleaded not guilty, were not withdrawn and dismissed by the Government on the record. This eventuality was a negotiated term of the plea agreement and was specifically discussed with Appellant. 3 Although the Entry of Judgment indicates those specifications were withdrawn and dismissed, we find no evidence in the record of that actually occurring. Therefore, pursuant to our authority under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, we now DISMISS Specifications 2-6, 8-10 and 12-14 of the Charge. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

3 App. Ex. II at 9; R. at 71-72.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. BOLES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boles-nmcca-2025.