United States v. Bole

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bole

404 F. App'x 418

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 8, 2010·No. No. 10-10329·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Michael Glenn Bole, filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bole’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Michael Glenn Bole, filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bole’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bole, 404 F. App'x 418 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

404 F. App'x 418 (United States v. Bole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related