United States v. Bole

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: December 8, 2010
• Docket: 10-10329
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 08, 2010 No. 10-10329 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:02-cr-00374-LSC-TMP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL GLENN BOLE,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________

(December 8, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Michael Glenn Bole, filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record

reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

and Bole’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.