United States v. Bojorquez-Alvarez
This text of 516 F. App'x 642 (United States v. Bojorquez-Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Victor Manuel Bojorquez-Alvarez appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Bojorquez-Alvarez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the fact that, at the time of sentencing, he had already served an 18-month sentence for the immigration offense that triggered his revocation. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Bojorquez-Alvarez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The 12-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of Bojorquez-Alvarez’s failure to be deterred and breach of the court’s trust. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 F. App'x 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bojorquez-alvarez-ca9-2013.