United States v. Boggan

6 C.M.A. 111, 6 USCMA 111, 19 C.M.R. 237, 1955 CMA LEXIS 348, 1955 WL 3425
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1955
DocketNo. 6315
StatusPublished

This text of 6 C.M.A. 111 (United States v. Boggan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Boggan, 6 C.M.A. 111, 6 USCMA 111, 19 C.M.R. 237, 1955 CMA LEXIS 348, 1955 WL 3425 (cma 1955).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The accused was convicted by general court-martial of two offenses of failure to obey a lawful order, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 686; and assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 722. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement for two years. The convening authority disapproved the findings as to failure to obey, but approved both the finding as to assault and the sentence. A board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General of the Army, composed of three members but with only two participating, affirmed. We granted the petition for review only because other cases were pending which involve the same issue, namely, whether a board of review with two members sitting, possessed the power to act.

The principles set forth in United States v. Petroff-Tachomakoff, 5 USCMA 824, 19 CMR 120, dispose of the only'issue in this case.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Petroff-Tachomakoff
5 C.M.A. 824 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 C.M.A. 111, 6 USCMA 111, 19 C.M.R. 237, 1955 CMA LEXIS 348, 1955 WL 3425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boggan-cma-1955.