United States v. Bogenreif
This text of 8 C.M.A. 496 (United States v. Bogenreif) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
The accused’s conviction of desertion must be set aside because of the law officer’s erroneous instruction regard[497]*497ing the inference to be drawn from a much-prolonged absence. United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. Accordingly, the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, order a rehearing on the desertion charge or approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining approved findings of guilt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 C.M.A. 496, 8 USCMA 496, 24 C.M.R. 306, 1957 CMA LEXIS 325, 1957 WL 4775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bogenreif-cma-1957.