United States v. Bobo

652 F.2d 453
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 3, 1981
DocketNos. 80-7100, 80-7238
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 652 F.2d 453 (United States v. Bobo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bobo, 652 F.2d 453 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court correctly denied appellant’s motion to vacate sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant was tried and convicted under the same indictment involved in U. S. v. Kennington, 650 F.2d 544 (1981), and the decision in that case controls this case.

As in Kennington, the district court must amend the sentence to delete the special parole term imposed under 21 U.S.C. § 846. Bifulco v. U. S., 447 U.S. 381, 100 S.Ct. 2247, 65 L.Ed.2d 205 (1980). At the same time in the judgment of conviction the court should delete the erroneous reference to 21 U.S.C. § 341 because appellant contends this reference causes difficulty with the parole board.

AFFIRMED with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Augustus Charles Bobo
652 F.2d 453 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 F.2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bobo-ca5-1981.