United States v. Bobo

652 F.2d 453
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 3, 1981·No. Nos. 80-7100, 80-7238·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court correctly denied appellant’s motion to vacate sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant was tried and convicted under the same indictment involved in U. S. v. Kennington, 650 F.2d 544 (1981), and the decision in that case controls this case.

As in Kennington, the district court must amend the sentence to delete the special parole term imposed under 21 U.S.C. § 846. Bifulco v. U. S., 447 U.S. 381, 100 S.Ct. 2247, 65 L.Ed.2d 205 (1980). At the same time in the judgment of conviction the court should delete the erroneous reference to 21 U.S.C. § 341 because appellant contends this reference causes difficulty with the parole board.

AFFIRMED with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bobo, 652 F.2d 453 (5th Cir. 1981).

652 F.2d 453 (United States v. Bobo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Augustus Charles Bobo
652 F.2d 453 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)