United States v. Bobby Gene Barfield

461 F.2d 661, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1972
Docket71-3280
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 461 F.2d 661 (United States v. Bobby Gene Barfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bobby Gene Barfield, 461 F.2d 661, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9182 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Bobby Gene Barfield, was charged with the crime of escape in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751. A jury found Barfield guilty, and he was sentenced to a term of five years to run consecutively to other sentences he is serving.

On appeal, Barfield challenges the sufficiency of the evidence offered by the Government. Barfield contends that, in view of his defense of temporary insanity, the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680, we conclude that there was ample evidence from which the jury could conclude that Barfield was guilty of the offense charged.

Barfield also contends that the district court erred in admitting testi *662 mony as to certain voluntary, unsolicited statements made by Barfield to a jailer. The refusal of the trial court to suppress the evidence was not, however, error. See United States v. Garcia, 2 Cir. 1967, 377 F.2d 321, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 991, 88 S.Ct. 489, 19 L.Ed.2d 484; United States v. Wolff, 7 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 413.

» We have carefully examined Barfield’s other contentions as to alleged errors in limiting the examination of certain witnesses, the refusal to require the attendance of certain witnesses, and the introduction of evidence. We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Henry
447 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
436 F. Supp. 704 (D. Delaware, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 F.2d 661, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bobby-gene-barfield-ca5-1972.