United States v. Bobby Andrew Ivory
This text of 468 F.2d 613 (United States v. Bobby Andrew Ivory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ivory appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts entered on a jury verdict of guilty of passing and possessing counterfeit money in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472. Without having moved for a judgment of acquittal in the district court, Ivory seeks reversal on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a conviction under either count. We affirm.
In a long unbroken line of cases, United States v. Hopkins, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 1353, being the most recent, we have adhered to the principle that “[i]n such a case our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is limited to a determination of whether there has occurred a ‘manifest miscarriage of jus *614 tice.’ We have held that such a miscarriage would exist only if it appears that the record is ‘devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.’ ” Id. at 1354 (footnotes omitted).
The evidence before the jury in this case not only pointed to guilt, it was overwhelming.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 F.2d 613, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bobby-andrew-ivory-ca5-1972.