United States v. Bobby Andrew Ivory

468 F.2d 613, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6873
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 3, 1972·No. 72-2368·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ivory appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts entered on a jury verdict of guilty of passing and possessing counterfeit money in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472. Without having moved for a judgment of acquittal in the district court, Ivory seeks reversal on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a conviction under either count. We affirm.

In a long unbroken line of cases, United States v. Hopkins, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 1353, being the most recent, we have adhered to the principle that “[i]n such a case our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is limited to a determination of whether there has occurred a ‘manifest miscarriage of jus *614 tice.’ We have held that such a miscarriage would exist only if it appears that the record is ‘devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.’ ” Id. at 1354 (footnotes omitted).

The evidence before the jury in this case not only pointed to guilt, it was overwhelming.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bobby Andrew Ivory, 468 F.2d 613, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6873 (5th Cir. 1972).

468 F.2d 613 (United States v. Bobby Andrew Ivory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Claude Williams
407 F. App'x 791 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
U.S. v. Pierre
Fifth Circuit, 1992
United States v. Francisco Javier Munoz-Romo
947 F.2d 170 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Randall Hoyt Shaw
920 F.2d 1225 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Javier Robles-Pantoja
887 F.2d 1250 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Nestor Ruiz, Jr.
860 F.2d 615 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)