United States v. Bob Robins

453 F.2d 1374
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 1972
Docket71-1197
StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1374 (United States v. Bob Robins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bob Robins, 453 F.2d 1374 (8th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Bob Robins, brings this direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered against him, on two counts of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473, in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri. He contends on appeal that:

1) he did not knowingly and in full awareness of his rights waive his right to trial by jury;
2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict;
3) the sentence he received constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

We have reviewed each of these contentions and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court pursuant to Rule 14 of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bob-robins-ca8-1972.