United States v. Boards, Planks & Shingles Claimed by Bissell & Fitch

Michigan Supreme Court

United States v. Boards, Planks & Shingles Claimed by Bissell & Fitch

1 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 48

DecidedJuly 1, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 48 (United States v. Boards, Planks & Shingles Claimed by Bissell & Fitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Boards, Planks & Shingles Claimed by Bissell & Fitch, 1 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 48 (Mich. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Journal Entries

1. Libel filed; proclamation; claim . Journal, infra, *p. ' fO

2. Bond filed; answer filed..... ^

3. Replication filed; rejoinder; evidence taken ^

4. Evidence concluded; case argued tN

5. Opinion, judgment and decree 9

Papers in File

Printed in Vol. 2 1. Libel ....

2. Answer and claim

3. Replication .

[49]*494. Deposition of Luther Cooley Printed in Vol. 2

5. Testimony of Joseph Wilkinson, Ebenezer Green, William McDowell Scott, Ephraim Town, John Gentle, Isaac Bissell, John Dodemead, Ben Chittenden, Abraham Cook, John Watson and John Robinson .

6. Draft of opinion, judgment and decree..........

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI