United States v. Blumenberg
This text of 96 F. App'x 776 (United States v. Blumenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
In this sentencing-only appeal, defendant Fritz Blumenberg, who pleaded guilty to charges of mail and wire fraud, conspiracy thereto, and subscribing to and filing false tax returns, contends that he is entitled to a downward departure for diminished mental capacity, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5K2.13 (1995),
Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments of the parties, we conclude that, in the circumstances presented here, there was no error in the decision of the District Court. District courts have wide discretion in determining whether and to what extent to downwardly depart, see, e.g., United States v. Lawal, 17 F.3d 560, 562 (2d Cir.1994), and the extent to which the Court departed in this case was clearly within that discretion. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
In 1995, § 5K2.13 provided:
If the defendant committed a non-violent offense while suffering from significantly reduced mental capacity not resulting from voluntary use of drugs or other intoxicants, a lower sentence may be warranted to re-fleet the extent to which reduced mental capacity contributed to the commission of the offense, provided that the defendant’s criminal history does not indicate a need for incarceration to protect the public.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blumenberg-ca2-2004.