United States v. Bloomgart
This text of 24 F. Cas. 1182 (United States v. Bloomgart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said this was the first time-he was called on to pronounce judgment against an acquaintance, and that motives off friendship inclined him to leniency, but that he had a duty to perform which he could not overlook, and that the security of the government required that such an offense should be punished, as the only security the govern[1183]*1183ment had was the integrity of its officers. In answer to the usual question, Bloomgart replied that he had no objections to the verdict of the jury — that he was guilty — but asked the court to save his family from disgrace attaching to them.
It is understood that Bloomgart’s friends will ask the president to pardon him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. Cas. 1182, 8 Int. Rev. Rec. 3, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bloomgart-kyd-1868.