United States v. Blohm

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 4, 2003
• Docket: 02-6972
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6972

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM BLOHM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-86-1184)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Blohm, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William Blohm appeals the district court’s order denying his

“Motion for Compassionate Release.” Our review of the record

discloses no reversible error and no abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED