United States v. Blohm

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Blohm

55 F. App'x 202

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2003·No. No. 02-6972·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Blohm appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Compassionate Release.” Our review of the record discloses no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Blohm appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Compassionate Release.” Our review of the record discloses no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Blohm, 55 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 202 (United States v. Blohm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.