United States v. Blaz
This text of 933 F.2d 1018 (United States v. Blaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
933 F.2d 1018
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, ex rel James R. RICHARDS,
Inspector General, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
Joaquin BLAZ, in his capacity as Director, Department of
Revenue and Taxation, Government of Guam,
Respondent-Appellant.
No. 90-15347.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 9, 1991.
Decided May 14, 1991.
Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This appeal is dismissed as moot.
The dismissal is without prejudice to an application by the appellant to the district court for injunctive relief in order to prevent a violation of any applicable provision of law prohibiting disclosure of confidential information.
This panel retains jurisdiction of any appeals that may arise out of such further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 F.2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blaz-ca9-1991.