United States v. Blatney

76 M.J. 450, 2017 WL 4004312
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided August 10, 2017·No. No. 17-0458/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA 2016-16

DAILY JOURNAL

Orders Granting Petition for Review

On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION BY SUPPRESSING EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM APPELLANT’S CELLULAR PHONE, WHERE LAW ENFORCEMENT REQUESTED THAT APPELLANT ENTER HIS PASSWORD TWICE TO DECRYPT THE PHONE AND DISABLE SECURITY AFTER HE INVOKED HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL.

Pursuant to Rule -19(a)(7)(A), no further pleadings will be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blatney, 76 M.J. 450, 2017 WL 4004312 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 450 (United States v. Blatney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.