United States v. Blanco Rodriguez
This text of United States v. Blanco Rodriguez (United States v. Blanco Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4480 Doc: 42 Filed: 05/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-4480
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BLANCO NAYALI MORENO RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-cr-00362-BO-2)
Submitted: May 23, 2023 Decided: May 25, 2023
Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Chiege Ojugo Kalu Okwara, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Katherine S. Englander, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4480 Doc: 42 Filed: 05/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Blanco Nayali Moreno Rodriguez pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea
agreement, to two drug charges and a firearm charge. The district court sentenced her to
the statutory mandatory minimum of 180 months’ imprisonment, and she now appeals.
Her sole appellate claim concerns the adequacy of her plea counsel’s performance during
the plea bargaining proceedings. We affirm.
“In this Circuit, a defendant may raise an ineffective assistance claim for the first
time on direct appeal only where the ineffectiveness conclusively appears from the record.”
United States v. Ojedokun, 16 F.4th 1091, 1115 (4th Cir. 2021) (internal quotation marks
omitted), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 2780 (2022). Otherwise, such a claim “should be raised,
if at all, in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” United States v. Barnett, 48 F.4th 216, 222
n.3 (4th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 823 (2023).
Based on our review, we do not find that plea counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness
conclusively appears from the record. As a result, Moreno Rodriguez’s claim of ineffective
assistance is “not cognizable on direct appeal.” Id. Accordingly, we affirm the criminal
judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Blanco Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blanco-rodriguez-ca4-2023.